The fathers rights foundation
The fathers rights foundation
Below are some FREE tactical tricks of the trade
used by
attorneys in court. Many more are discussed in the custody/divorce kit authored
by attorney Isaacs. The
CUSTODY/DIVORCE KIT
contains MANY tricks of the trade integrated throughout the text on each subject
covered and is our BEST BUY. 
50%off
TRICK OF THE
TRADE
If you argue that your spouse is unfit because her own pleadings and actions try
to minimize vice maximize your time with the children while your pleadings ask
for maximum involvement of both parents, you place your spouse in a legal box.
She will either increase her offers or look foolish trying to explain to a cross
examiner why she should have more time with the children than you and would run
a serious risk of losing or not obtaining custody. Either way, you better your
position and minimize emotional damage to the children. Even if you don't win
custody, you will enjoy much more visitation than fathers usually are awarded.
TRICK OF THE TRADE
When you stand up for your rights (including custody), spouses who think they
can run over you, and take your kids, house and money, suddenly face the
possibility that they may lose custody and be required to pay child support.
Suddenly they become more reasonable. Do not begin settlement negotiations by
being reasonable. Demand everything just like she does! In negotiations you can
only compromise down . If your first offer is reasonable, where do you go from
there? If you do not ask for sole custody several of the tactics in this book
will not be as effective. ALWAYS file for custody, even in support matters.
TRICK OF THE TRADE
Pleadings requesting only limited visitation are the best evidence of an
unwillingness to facilitate! Use those pleadings as an example in your closing
argument. Argue: "My client seeks equal time for the parents. Mrs. X seeks to
limit the father’s time to every other weekend. Mrs. X’s pleadings ... (lift up
her pleadings).. and arguments before this court ... are the best evidence of
her unwillingness to further a close and continuing relationship between the
child and the father!"
TRICK OF THE TRADE
In his opening argument, a good attorney will pull out the applicable statute or
case and go down the list of "tests" or factors deemed controlling by statute or
case law. With the statute in his hand, he covers the factors deemed controlling
by statute or case law one by one in his examinations and cross examinations of
both parties. In his closing argument, he then points out the differences
between the parties as to each of those factors. During the case he will argue
that anything else brought up is irrelevant and inadmissable. This tactic often
keeps an honest judge honest and frames the arguments to your advantage.
This tactic alone may win your case!
US Department of Health and Human Services
summarizes the risks of sole custody, single parent families: "More than a
quarter of American children-nearly 17 million-do not live with their
father. Girls without a father in their life are two and a half times as
likely to get pregnant."
The
CUSTODY/DIVORCE KIT
contains MANY MORE tricks
of the trade integrated throughout the text on each subject covered and is our
BEST BUY.
THE GUIDE TO FATHERS RIGHTS ,WHICH IS ALSO INCLUDED IN THE DIVORCE CUSTODY KIT with FIGHTING FALSE ALLEGATIONS , AND MINIMIZING CHILD SUPPORT IS THE ORIGINAL REFERENCE ON COMBATING PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME.
CLICK HERE FOR REGULARLY UPDATED ATTORNEY WRITTEN WARNINGS FOR FATHERS
FREE MOTION TO VACATE ORDER OF PROTECTION:
MOTION TO REHEAR AND VACATE
THIS DOCUMENT AND OVER 100 OTHER SIMILAR DOCUMENTS IS AVAILABLE AT
NOW COMES, the , by and through attorney, , and moves the Court to Rehear and Vacate the Emergency Order of Protection, and in support states as follows:
1. is the of minor child(ren), age , , age , and , age .
2. is the primary caretaker of child(ren),
, , .
3. Without good cause, the Order of Protection transfers the physical care and possession of the minor child(ren) from their to the ; orders the to stay away from child(ren); and denies visitation to the .
4. The allegations in the Petition for Emergency Order of Protection are false.
5. "The Domestic Violence Act" was misused by and was a subterfuge to permit to circumvent the requirements of Section 602- the best interest of the child of the "Marriage Act". Gordon v. Gordon, 233 Ill. App. 3rd 617 (1st Dist 1992).
6. The Petition for Order of Protection is not well grounded in fact, it is interposed for
the improper purpose to obtain an unfair advantage in pending custody litigation and should be sanctioned.
7. There is no evidence of immediate danger of abuse or exigent circumstances.
8. There is no good cause to grant the remedies granted.
9. Limiting the child(ren)'s visitation with their is improper and unauthorized.
10. did not receive prior notice of the initial hearing in which
the emergency order was entered. 750 ILCS 60/224 (d) (1)
11. had a meritorious defense to the Order. 750 ILCS 60/224 (d) (2)
12. The emergency order was not authorized by the Illinois Domestic Violence Act.
750 ILCS 60/224 (d) (2)
13. There is no evidence that harm would be likely to occur if
was notified of the ex parte hearing taking place.
14. The requirements of Section 214 are not satisfied.
15. has incurred necessary and reasonable attorney fees to
defend said Petition.
16. The Affidavit of is attached hereto and incorporated
herein.
WHEREFORE, prays the Court to Rehear and Vacate the
Emergency Order of Protection, and award attorney fees and costs, and for such further relief as the court deems equitable and just.
___________________________
__________________________
Attorney at Law
930 West Walnut
Carbondale IL 62901
VERIFICATION BY CERTIFICATION
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to section 1-109 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that verily believes the same to be true.
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing instruments was served upon:
by enclosing the same in an envelope addressed to the address as disclosed by the pleadings of record herein, with postage fully prepaid, and by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Post Office mail box in Carbondale, Illinois, on the _____ day of ____________________, 1997.
______________________________
Norma J. Beedle
Attorney At Law
930 West Walnut
Carbondale, IL. 62901
(618) 529-4360
ORDER
THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard on the 's, , Motion to Rehear and Vacate, and the Court having reviewed the pleadings and being duly advised in the premises:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The Motion is granted and that the Emergency Order of Protection filed on the
day of , 2008 against is.hereby vacated.
DATE:_______________________
________________________
J U D G E
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) SS.
COUNTY OF JACKSON )
I, , being duly sworn on oath, state as follows:
1. I am age and the in the above-entitled cause.
2. I am or was a primary caretaker of my minor child(ren) , age , , age , and , age .
3.The allegations made against me are false and made solely to deprive me of access to my children without a proper hearing, in particular:
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.
VERIFICATION
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to Section 1-109 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that believes the same to be true.
DATED:
Attorney at Law
930 W. Walnut
Carbondale, IL 62901
618-529-4360
RETURN TO:
FATHERS RIGHTS FOUNDATION PAGE OR
